Back

Managing Risk in Scrum: Risk Assessment

While Agile and Scrum are specifically targeted at minimizing risk, this does not mean that risk to any project can be ignored. The Scrum risk management process has much in common with most other risk management frameworks, and, if your company has adopted a specific framework, it is recommended that you align the Scrum risk management framework to that of your organisation. If you do not have a formal risk management framework in place, this is a straightforward process that has much in common with ISO 31000, although there is some variance in the grouping of the main activities, but not their content.

This is a description of the second sub-process of five – namely the assessing of risk.

The Scrum Risk Management Process

Risk management is an iterative process, which makes it easy to integrate into Scrum.

The process starts with the identification of a risk, which is reported in a suitable forum, like the daily stand-up meeting, although a risk can be identified and reported by anyone at any time. The severity of the risk then needs to be assessed. If one or more risks are reported in a standup meeting, it may be advisable to call a separate meeting for assessment and prioritization, for three main reasons:-

  • The stand-up meeting is timeboxed to about 15 minutes and is just long enough for the team to report on their daily progress, while assessing a single risk could easily take 15 minutes.
  • The Product Owner is an optional attendee of the stand-up meetings and is expected to act as an observer, rather than an active participant when he does attend. However, he also has responsibility for risk assessment and prioritization.
  • It is quite possible that assessing the risk requires input from one or more stakeholders, who would not be at the standup meeting.

Recommended Further Reading

The following materials may assist you in order to get the most out of this course:

Section 2: Using the Agile Manifesto to Deliver Change

Section 3: The 12 Agile Principles

Section 4: The Agile Fundamentals

Section 5: The Declaration of Interdependence

Section 6: Agile Development Frameworks

Section 7: Introduction to Scrum

Section 8: Scrum Projects

Section 9: Scrum Project Roles

Section 10: Meet the Scrum Team

Section 11: Building the Scrum Team

Section 12: Scrum in Projects, Programs & Portfolios

Section 13: How to Manage an Agile Project

Section 14: Leadership Styles

Section 15: The Agile Project Life-cycle

Section 16: Business Justification with Agile

Section 17: Calculating the Benefits With Agile

Section 18: Quality in Agile

Section 19: Acceptance Criteria and the Prioritised Product Backlog

Section 20: Quality Management in Scrum

Section 21: Change in Scrum

Section 22: Integrating Change in Scrum

Section 23: Managing Change in Scrum

Section 24: Risk in Scrum

Section 25: Risk Assessment Techniques

Section 26: Initiating an Agile Project

Section 27: Forming the Scrum Team

Section 28: Epics and Personas

Section 29: Creating the Prioritised Product Backlog

Section 30: Conduct Release Planning

Section 31: The Project Business Case

Section 32: Planning in Scrum

Section 33: Scrum Boards

Section 34: Sprint Planning

Section 35: User Stories

Section 36: User Stories and Tasks

Section 37: The Sprint Backlog

Section 38: Implementation of Scrum

Section 39: The Daily Scrum

Section 40: The Product Backlog

Section 41: Scrum Charts

Section 42: Review and Retrospective

Section 43: Scrum of Scrums

Section 44: Validating a Sprint

Section 45: Retrospective Sprint

Section 46: Releasing the Product

Section 47: Project Retrospective

Section 48: The Communication Plan

Section 49: Formal Business Sign-off

Section 50: Scaling Scrum

Section 51: Stakeholders

Section 52: Programs and Portfolios

Translate »